MAIT Rejects Claims Of Mandatory Source Code Sharing, Backs MeitY's Framework

The Manufacturers' Association for Information Technology (MAIT) has publicly refuted recent reports alleging that smartphone and electronics manufacturers operating in India would be compelled to share proprietary source code with government authorities. These claims were described by MAIT as "incorrect and misleading," emphasizing that the industry body supports a balanced approach that respects both national security and intellectual property rights.

MAIT's clarification comes in response to widespread concerns following the release of the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology's (MeitY) memorandum dated June 18, 2025. This memorandum outlines the Information Technology Security Assessment Requirements (ITSAR) framework, which provides guidelines for security assessments of electronic devices. Importantly, MAIT highlighted that this updated framework supersedes earlier drafts and discussions that had raised alarms about mandatory source code disclosure.

The ITSAR framework, as endorsed by MAIT, aims to establish a clear and transparent process for security evaluations without imposing compulsory source code sharing. This approach is intended to address national security imperatives while simultaneously safeguarding the intellectual property of global electronics manufacturers operating in India. MAIT's support signals confidence that the framework strikes an appropriate balance, alleviating fears that manufacturers would be forced to reveal sensitive proprietary information.

The industry body's stance reflects ongoing dialogues between government agencies and electronics manufacturers to ensure that security protocols do not undermine innovation or competitive advantage. By backing MeitY's memorandum, MAIT reinforces the importance of collaborative engagement to develop policies that protect consumers and the broader digital ecosystem without imposing undue burdens on manufacturers.

This development is significant for the Indian electronics sector, which has seen growing investment from international companies. Clear guidance on security assessments, coupled with assurances against mandatory source code disclosure, may encourage further participation and trust in the Indian market. It also underscores the government's commitment to enhancing cybersecurity while respecting the concerns of industry stakeholders.

In summary, MAIT's rejection of the mandatory source code sharing claims and its endorsement of MeitY's amended ITSAR framework provide clarity and reassurance to manufacturers. This balanced policy approach is expected to foster a secure and innovation-friendly environment in India's electronics industry.